Latest NCAT Expert Witness Articles

When it comes to building defect disputes, understanding whether to commence proceedings in the Tribunal or Court is an important consideration. Whether you’re a homeowner seeking justice or an expert witness preparing to testify, the differences between court and Tribunal proceedings can significantly impact your experience and the outcome of your case. This article delves into these distinctions, offering valuable insights for both homeowners and expert witnesses navigating the complex world of building defect litigation.

As we conclude our series on expert witnesses in building defect disputes, we turn our focus to the crucial role of expert evidence in NCAT decision-making. Drawing from landmark cases and “The Practitioner’s Guide to Briefing Experts,” we’ll explore how expert testimony shapes NCAT’s rulings in home building disputes.

Following our discussions on expert witness best practices, writing expert reports, and avoiding common pitfalls, this article focuses on how homeowners can effectively collaborate with building experts in NCAT proceedings. We’ll draw insights from landmark cases and “The Practitioner’s Guide to Briefing Experts” to help homeowners navigate this crucial relationship.

Building on our previous discussions about expert witness best practices and writing expert reports for NCAT, this article focuses on common pitfalls that building experts should avoid in NCAT proceedings. We’ll draw insights from landmark cases and “The Practitioner’s Guide to Briefing Experts” to help experts navigate these challenges effectively.

Structure and Content: 1. Clear and Concise Summary: Begin with a clear summary of the issues, opinions, and conclusions. As emphasised in Harrington-Smith on behalf

When homeowners find themselves in disputes over building defects, expert witnesses often play a crucial role in NCAT proceedings. Two landmark cases, while not directly related to building disputes, offer valuable insights into how experts should conduct themselves and prepare their evidence. Let’s explore the key takeaways from Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd [2005] FCA 1242 and Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia (No 7) [2003] FCA 893.